Do VWCE and EIMI hold the same companies?

At least 8% of a half-and-half mix sits in companies held through both, led by 2330.TW. Funds publish only their largest positions, so this measurement reaches 28% of the money: the real overlap is at least this and cannot be smaller.

Do VWCE and EIMI fall together?

Measured from 2014-05-30 to 2026-09-22, the worst fall on record was 33% for VWCE and 35% for EIMI. Held half and half, the worst fall was 33%. Over the same window, essentially all of the movement travels in one shared direction.

What changes if both are held?

A half-and-half mix had volatility 16% over this window, against 16% for VWCE and 19% for EIMI, and its worst fall was 33%. Inside that mix, EIMI carries 56% of the risk for half of the money.

How are these figures measured?

From daily closing prices supplied by Yahoo Finance, over 2014-05-30 to 2026-09-22 — 3,090 trading days, in EUR — by the same engine that serves the app. Every figure describes what has already happened: nothing here forecasts returns or losses, and nothing here is advice.

← Risk Co-PilotEN · IT · DE

VWCE vs EIMI overlap: how much of them is the same

Measured over 12 years of daily prices: what each one brings, and what changes when both are held.

Measured on 2026-09-22

At least 8% of the money lands in the same companies. In a half-and-half mix, essentially all of the movement travels in one shared direction.

The companies both of them hold

Company	Share of a half-and-half mix	Through
2330.TW	7.5%	EIMI 6.7% · VWCE 0.9%
005930.KQ	3.1%	EIMI 3.1% — held through one of the two only
000660.KQ	2.3%	EIMI 2.3% — held through one of the two only
NVDA	2.2%	VWCE 2.2% — held through one of the two only
AAPL	2.1%	VWCE 2.1% — held through one of the two only

A fund publishes only its largest positions, so this measurement reaches 28% of the money. The share above is what is shared within that part: it is a floor, never the total overlap.

The worst falls on record

Holding	Worst fall	Volatility
VWCE	33%	16%
EIMI	35%	19%
Both, half and half	33%	16%

Measured on the same window for all three rows, so they can be read against each other. A fall is peak to trough on daily closes.

Where the risk sits in a half-and-half mix

Holding	Money	Risk	Ratio
EIMI	50%	56%	1.12
VWCE	50%	44%	0.88

The reading, in full

PORTFOLIO: VWCE + EIMI
2014-05-30 to 2026-09-22 · 3,090 trading days · EUR

2 holdings.
Essentially all of it is one shared direction, led by EIMI.L, VWCE.DE.

EIMI.L carries 56% of the risk on its own.
Volatility 16% · worst fall on record 33%.
Risk 16% → 16% over the last year, mostly because the holdings themselves got quieter.

Descriptive. No forecast, no advice. Every figure above is measured over the window named at the top.
riskcopilot.app

Questions people ask about this pair

Do VWCE and EIMI hold the same companies?: At least 8% of a half-and-half mix sits in companies held through both, led by 2330.TW. Funds publish only their largest positions, so this measurement reaches 28% of the money: the real overlap is at least this and cannot be smaller.
Do VWCE and EIMI fall together?: Measured from 2014-05-30 to 2026-09-22, the worst fall on record was 33% for VWCE and 35% for EIMI. Held half and half, the worst fall was 33%. Over the same window, essentially all of the movement travels in one shared direction.
What changes if both are held?: A half-and-half mix had volatility 16% over this window, against 16% for VWCE and 19% for EIMI, and its worst fall was 33%. Inside that mix, EIMI carries 56% of the risk for half of the money.
How are these figures measured?: From daily closing prices supplied by Yahoo Finance, over 2014-05-30 to 2026-09-22 — 3,090 trading days, in EUR — by the same engine that serves the app. Every figure describes what has already happened: nothing here forecasts returns or losses, and nothing here is advice.

What this does not say

Every figure is measured on past daily prices over the window below. It is not a forecast of returns or losses.
The window starts when the younger fund began trading, so older crises may lie outside it.
The overlap is measured through published holdings only, and is a floor: the real figure is at least this, and cannot be smaller.
Which of two funds to hold depends on things not measured here — what you already own, costs at your broker, and your own tax position.

Measure it with what you actually hold

Change the split, add the rest of your portfolio, see what the pair does inside it: same engine, nothing saved on our side.

Measure this pair Open the app

Other pairs

VOO vs VTI overlap: how much of them is the same VOO vs SPY overlap: how much of them is the same SPY vs IVV overlap: how much of them is the same SPY vs QQQ overlap: how much of them is the same VOO vs QQQ overlap: how much of them is the same QQQ vs QQQM overlap: how much of them is the same Famous portfolios, measured every trading day →

Measured 2014-05-30 to 2026-09-22 over 3,090 trading days, in EUR, from Yahoo Finance prices. Descriptive: this page reports what these two funds have done and how much of them is the same holding. It does not forecast returns or losses, it does not say which to hold, and it is not advice. How every figure is measured. Terms and privacy: /terms. If a figure looks wrong: [email protected].